youtube.com/shawnmcpike   delicious.com/shawnmcpike   linkedin.com/in/shawnmcpike   flickr.com/photos/mcpike   shawnmcpike.com/feed/rss  

The Best Engagement Strategy is One of Disengagement

Inspired from some great posts by folks like Jay Baer, John Moore and Amber Naslund, I wanted to weigh in on the topic of customer engagement. Everywhere you turn, people everywhere are chanting the mantra of engagement, sometimes at the expense of a formal, planned out strategy. Some even go so far to say that true open, honest and transparent engagement precludes the pre-planning and process mapping inherent in defining and executing a robust enterprise strategy.

Now this is not to say that engagement is not important. Firstly, all businesses have to engage on some level – with business partners, consumers or through electronic mediums – somehow they must engage to sell their product. However, the level of engagement needs to be addressed by first looking at your customer base. If you sell wax rings for toilet bases, perhaps you don’t need a robust transparent engagement strategy with consumers on FriendFeed, Twitter or Facebook. And as good as it feels to record a YouTube video demonstrating installation of your wax ring, it’s doubtful that iJustine is going to favorite it.

So how do you go about determining how to address your engagement strategy? You disengage. Disengage from the old ways of thinking. Disengage from the tendency to believe that you know better than your customer what they need. Disengage from putting your foot in the customer’s electronic front door when they try to tell you that they want to be less engaged with you. Disengage from overactive, repetitive and unnecesssary engagement. Customers are smart and know how to find information and do not need you to broadcast to them through email, DM or status update eight times a day information they can easily pull through an RSS feed, Twitter search or Google query.

Yes, disengage from engagement.

Only then can you fully and, without bias, address your customers from their point of view. Asking a customer that you blast repeatedly how they want to to tailor your blasts to them will always yield predictable results. The feedback inevitably will be retreat from your message, even those parts that they find of value. As a teenager, I thought (as we all did) that I knew better than my parents. So when my father would walk in the house and say “Son, when are you going to wash that car? It’s filthy”, even though I was heading out the door to go wash it, I would turn around and say “I don’t know. Whenever.” I’d then proceed to (even though it didn’t benefit me) wait another week to wash it. I viewed my dad’s method of engagement as one that I would repel from. Had he come in and said “Son, I see your car is dirty. Let’s spend some time talking while we wash it together” I likely would’ve had a much different (and more positive) reply.

It is when you show your customers respect and disengage from them, and tell them that you are listening to their desires to be spared unnecessary and unwanted communication from you, that they will begin to listen. You see, it was they who created social networks to escape from the unwanted interruptions of the rest of us. If we invade their Facebook like we did their home phone via cold calls, and email with unsolicited spam, and web sites with presenting five layers of self-service before allowing someone to find a phone number to call you – a predictable result will occur. The next great medium will emerge and customers will flock to it and away from your engagement, leaving you to diagnose how your great engagement strategy ultimately led to disengagement.

Engaging too much will ultimately lead to disengagement with your customers. It is only by disengaging – and listening – really listening to them – that you will ultimately be able to succeed in engaging them. They want to tell you. You just have to ask them the question from a position of trust. You’ll be surprised at the response.

Debunking and Spelunking: The Rules of Social Media, Part I

Welcome to my new blog, the Social Media Spelunker. A place where I’m going to feel out exactly what to discuss within this forum. And I’m going to rely on you to give me feedback on the types of material you’d like to see here.

Now, you may be asking yourself “What is a Social Media Spelunker?” By definition, a spelunker is “one who makes a habit of studying and exploring caves.” Caves can be dark and mysterious places and can also be very attractive to the adventurous or overconfident. However, there are many pitfalls and hidden dangers awaiting those who blindly stampede into them unprepared.

Forays into social media, if you had not guessed by now, are much like those into caves. Those who have entered them feel qualified to hold themselves out as experts. After all, they seem innocuous enough. But the dangers are real, and their consequences can be big. Even the most experienced companies can fall prey to their allure (if you don’t believe that, ask Delta, Dell or Nestle).

So what can you do to prepare? Exactly that – prepare. Don’t go in blind. Know what you want before going in, and what outcome you want to have afterward. Then perform the three “P”s:

  1. Plan - Lay out the roadmap of what you want to achieve.
  2. Prepare - Define your success metrics, and how you are going to achieve them (including assistive tools and targeted social media channels).
  3. Proceed - Implement everything you have planned out.

All that’s left now is to get started. Before we do, I’ll cover some of the basic rules of social media. These are not all of the rules, they are not even THE rules (if any such rules even exist), but they are the ones that I think are important. We’ll start with two of the biggest ones.

The Ten Rules of Social Media

1.  When Building a Social Media Strategy, your approach should not be terribly different than traditional marketing techniques. The opposite approach is simple, and equally wrong. If your strategy starts with “What is our Facebook (or other social media channel) strategy”, your very premise is flawed. Do you even know if your customers are even on Facebook? Let alone how many of them or their demographics if they are? Instead, begin by asking four basic questions.

  • What products or services are you trying to market?
  • Who are these products or services targeted toward?
  • Are they a participant in social media? If so, on what mediums (Facebook, Twitter)?
  • What marketing and promotion strategies will assist you in reaching them?

2. Your Companies Number of Fans/Followers do NOT Matter in the Least. Your number of
engaged fans however does matter greatly. Imagine the following scenario.

Company A: 400,000 fans / 50% engagement

Company B: 800,000 fans / 25% engagement

If we were looking to initiate a direct mail campaign, Company B’s raw numbers will get the most eyeballs on your promotional materials. But in social media, Company A’s numbers are far more valuable than Company B’s. Both companies have the same number of engaged fans, but Company B’s number of unengaged, transitory fans triple that of their engaged fan base, while Company A’s numbers of engaged and unengaged fans remain equal.

When the inevitable public relations disaster happens, Company B will find itself with a wave of overwhelming negative feedback from their perceived fan base that will dwarf that from their engaged fans. This will lead to the perception, whether real or implied, that the more frequent negative opinions are in fact the prevailing opinions of Company B’s entire customer base. It will also frustrate their real fans as their support for Company B will be drowned out by the mob. Unengaged fans are no more fans of your company than the average long-ball hitter at the driving range golfer is a qualified professional golfer.

In the next post, we’ll continue with rules 3 and 4. If you have suggestions of things you’d like to see, or if you agree/disagree with this post, post your comments and let’s all discuss it. That, after all, is the ultimate power of this social media medium.